Rationality in the teaching and learning of economics and its implications for human progress

  • Mario Alberto Álvarez López Doctor en Ciencias de la Educación. Integrante del Grupo de Investigación Educación y Desarrollo Humano, maalvarez2@usbcali.edu.co
  • Luz Adriana Bernal López Licenciada en Educación Ambiental y profesional en Gestión de Recursos Naturales. E-mail luzadrib29@gmail.com
  • Carlos Adolfo Rengifo Castañeda (E) PhD. Filosofía. Docente investigador de la Universidad San Buenaventura de Cali. Líder del grupo de investigación Educación y Desarrollo Humano. E-mail: Carengifo1@usbcali.edu.co careca1106@gmail.com
  • Diana Carolina Cañaveral Londoño E) Magíster en Derecho Público. Docente investigadora, miembro del Grupo de Investigación de Derecho Público de la Universidad la Gran Colombia Seccional Armenia. E-mail: / carolinacl82@gmail.com
Keywords: Science, economics, method, progress, rationality.

Abstract

In this article, product of a research, several purposes are intended. First, to provide to a lay audience certain generalities about rationality and its relationship with knowledge. Second, to present some of the aspects associated with the problem of rationality in economics. Third: to give an account of the reasons that make possible a conception about both science and scientific and human progress. Fourth, to recognize how this rationality -expressed in the method- responds, in a certain extent, to the logical and epistemological presuppositions settled from the classical time –and extended until the contemporaneity- prevailing in the different modes of construction of knowledge, in general terms; and that don’t acknowledge others ways of giving account of knowledge in relation to the particular ontologies of each science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2017-03-07
How to Cite
Álvarez LópezM. A., Bernal López, L. A., Rengifo Castañeda, C. A., & Cañaveral Londoño, D. C. (2017). Rationality in the teaching and learning of economics and its implications for human progress. Sophia, 13(1), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.18634/sophiaj.13v.1i.685
Section
Artículos de investigación