Legal pluralism: implications epistemologica

Abstract

This bibliographic Revision Article is presented as exhaustive exploration the so-called legal pluralism. From a philosophical perspective establishes the conceptual and logical consequences can have this theory to guide the interpretive practices of law. For this, and as a strategy, it is clarified first jus-jus-naturalism and positivism, shown their critical views with respect to certain criteria of objectivity arising from epistemology. Then we review the legal pluralism, noting that even though you can drag the criticism of jusnaturalism, and jus-positivism, commitment moderate with minimal human universals, the shielding of relativism and subjectivism.